• Skip to content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Contribute

SPIRE MAGAZINE

Earnest Perspectives on Changing Landscapes

  • View spiremag’s profile on Facebook
  • View spiremag’s profile on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • International
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Local
    • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • Science
  • Entertainment
    • Book Reviews
    • Music
      • Bops and Flops
  • Perspectives
  • Interviews
  • Series
    • Collegiate Lenses
    • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
    • Words You Don’t Know
    • Bops and Flops
You are here: Home / Perspectives / Coming To The “Same” Conversation
Coming To The “Same” Conversation

Coming To The “Same” Conversation

September 6, 2018 by Dani Brown 1 Comment

Productive debates cannot occur when we are having different conversations all-together.

As we continue to politicize our social media platforms, online political conversations are near impossible to avoid, whether you choose to participate or lurk in the comments section. At first, the commenters restrain themselves in hopes to maintain “civility” and attempt to create a productive dialogue between two opposing ideas. Then, the comment section begins to heat up due to disagreement. What usually takes place is that the comment section fills with people spewing their argument at a person who doesn’t want to hear it.

Try as they might, it seems fairly difficult to stay on the topic of the initial dilemma. What one person may view as an insignificant detail may lead down a rabbit hole to a different argument all-together. We wind up having two different conversations at once, and then wondering why we’re not getting through to the opposing side.

This happened at the start of Colin Kaepernick’s protests during the National Anthem while he was the quarterback for the 49ers back in August of 2017. Even though Kaepernick explicitly stated that his protests were in reference to police brutality towards black citizens, those who opposed his method of protest inclined to interpret his argument as taking a stand against the national anthem and veterans.

These vastly different conversations lead to a disconnect in the realm of political discourse around Kaepernick’s protest. How are we supposed to address police brutality if the other side claims to know your argument better than you do?

On the other hand, if you believe the national anthem is sacred and is not an appropriate space to protest, how do you convince your opponents to use another platform to voice their opinions and have “more respect for their country?”

The argument doesn’t go anywhere; it doesn’t progress because the opposing sides are no longer talking to one another. The conversation does not move because instead of fully hearing the complaints and concerns of the other side, many social media commenters are too busy planning to retort a point that their opponent isn’t even claiming.

Let’s unpack Nike’s sponsorship of Kaepernick in this week’s ad to fully illustrate this dissonance in conversation.

First, Kaepernick uses the time during the national anthem to kneel and protest police brutality.

Next, critics claim that because he is kneeling during the national anthem, he rhetorically attacks and criticizes the Troops and the national anthem.

When opposing ideas meet in the political sphere, that is the Facebook comment section, they come prepared to counter the conversation they expect to hear. One side is ready to argue the detrimental impact of police brutality. The other side is ready to argue if kneeling during the national anthem is unpatriotic.

On September 3rd, Nike released news that Kaepernick is the face of their 30th “Just Do It” campaign. In their ad, Kaepernick’s face stares straight at the viewer in monochromatic tones. “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything,” overlays Kaepernick’s image. The most recent Nike ad featuring Kaepernick led to some Americans rejecting Nike products and starting #boycottNike. On the more extreme end, some chose to burn their Nike products that they own, or at least cut out the labels off their products.

To reiterate, this boycott is based on the notion that Kaepernick is disrespecting the flag through protest.

This time around, the left is falling into their own misconstrued interpretation of the right’s protest of Nike, with many twitter users claiming that the boycott is simply because Nike chose a black man to represent their product.

This tweet is an incredibly unfortunate simplification of the conversation that not only misconstrues the argument of the right (which was a misinterpretation of Kaepernick’s initial argument—stay with me here) but also belittles the conversation around police brutality as a side-effect.

In regard to those who oppose Kaepernick’s stance, they are not burning Nike shoes because Nike chose a black man to represent their brand, as the athletics-ware company has already endorsed athletes Tiger Woods, Lebron James, and Michael Jordan to push their products in different advertisements. They’re boycotting because the opposition is still trying to have the flag conversation—and to them, Kaepernick’s image represents disrespect to the nation and the armed forces.

In order to have actual productive political discourse, it is vital that we are all in the same rhetorical sphere when it comes to hot-button political issues. If your opponent is not willing to step into your ring of conversation, perhaps that conversation is not the best use of your time. In addition, we also need to be aware when we are side-stepping the topic of a controversial issue. Most importantly, we need to keep the conversation going by retaining the integrity of the initial conversation.

If the Facebook community were better at that, we might have seen some progress come out of Kaepernick’s protest of police brutality, rather than arguing over how to respect the flag and blaming the Nike boycott on a black man’s face in an ad.

 

Check out Spire Magazine’s previous piece on Colin Kaepernick from last year. 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Print

Filed Under: Perspectives Tagged With: Football

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Agnes says

    September 9, 2018 at 8:50 pm

    Amen. Excellent Dani.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured Posts

Promising Young Woman : Will We Ever Triumph Over Trauma?

Promising Young Woman : Will We Ever Triumph Over Trauma?

The Intersectionality of Masculine Norms and Eating Disorders

The Intersectionality of Masculine Norms and Eating Disorders

“It’s Too F***ing Late” : 15 Protesters Arrested by TPD

“It’s Too F***ing Late” : 15 Protesters Arrested by TPD

Connect With Us

Connect With Us

Official Spotify (Click Image)

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Bops and Flops
  • Collegiate Lenses
  • Economics
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • International
  • Interviews
  • Local
  • Music
  • Music Reviews
  • Perspectives
  • Politics
  • Science
  • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
  • TV Reviews
  • Uncategorized
  • Words You Don't Know

Follow Us On Twitter

My Tweets

Popular Tags

Africa Bops and Flops China Cold War Colonialism Colonization Diversity Egypt entertainment Fashion feminism Film Finance Florida Florida State University Football FSU Gender Gun Violence History Horror Human Rights Interview Latin America LGTBQ Literature local Middle East Music music review perspectives politics Racism Science sga Space Sports Syria Syrian Civil War Tallahassee Television The F Word Video Games Women words you dont know

Secondary Sidebar

Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Bops and Flops
  • Collegiate Lenses
  • Economics
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • International
  • Interviews
  • Local
  • Music
  • Music Reviews
  • Perspectives
  • Politics
  • Science
  • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
  • TV Reviews
  • Uncategorized
  • Words You Don't Know

Recent Posts

  • February in Music : Bops and Flops
  • Promising Young Woman : Will We Ever Triumph Over Trauma?
  • What Does “Girl Power” Mean Anyway?
  • Women’s Sex Toys Aren’t Being Marketed The Way They Used To. Here’s What Changed.
  • January in Music : Bops and Flops

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in