• Skip to content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Contribute

SPIRE MAGAZINE

Earnest Perspectives on Changing Landscapes

  • View spiremag’s profile on Facebook
  • View spiremag’s profile on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • International
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Local
    • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • Science
  • Entertainment
    • Book Reviews
    • Music
      • Bops and Flops
  • Perspectives
  • Interviews
  • Series
    • Collegiate Lenses
    • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
    • Words You Don’t Know
    • Bops and Flops
You are here: Home / Featured / The Problem With Forced Parental Consent
The Problem With Forced Parental Consent

The Problem With Forced Parental Consent

January 17, 2020 by Alanna Felton 1 Comment

In the 2020 legislative session, the Florida Senate and House of Representatives will decide on two bills — HB 265 and SB 404, respectively, which would force minors to obtain parental consent before receiving an abortion. These forced parental consent bills represent an insidious challenge to abortion rights in Florida because, without context, they do not necessarily appear harmful or restrictive.

Many well-meaning adults might find it logical that a minor be forced to received parental consent or obtain a judicial bypass for an abortion. Proponents of the bills insist that abortion isn’t the issue, that they are seeking to protect parental rights. However, the parental rights argument is not being made in good faith. Instead, the Republican legislators supporting forced parental consent have demonstrated through words and actions that they are acting as part of a larger anti-choice agenda.

IMG_4294
 Protesters attend a committee hearing for SB 404, the Senate version of the forced parental consent bill. (Photo by: Tori Schneider)

This is not the first time that the Florida State Legislature has tried to pass forced parental consent. Far from it. Bills were introduced in the 2019 legislative session and failed, and a forced parental consent bill passed into law in 1985, but was ruled unconstitutional by the Florida Supreme Court. Why? Because of section 23 of the Florida constitution, commonly known as the privacy clause.

Passed by Florida constituents as a referendum in 1980, the privacy clause guarantees that “every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into the person’s private life except as otherwise provided herein,” going above and beyond the privacy rights granted by the state constitution.

In 1989, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that a woman’s right to bodily autonomy — including abortion —  is protected by the privacy clause. In their verdict, the court wrote that “Florida’s privacy provision is clearly implicated in a woman’s decision of whether or not to continue her pregnancy.”[3] This set a precedent which remains vital to protecting abortion rights in Florida. For instance, section 23 was key to a court ruling stopping a mandated 24-hour waiting period before an abortion in 2016. Under the privacy clause’s current interpretation, abortion would remain legal in Florida even if Roe v. Wade was overturned by the US Supreme Court.

However, Governor Ron DeSantis (R), who as a candidate pledged  “to sign legislation limiting access to abortion,” has appointed three conservative justices to the Florida Supreme Court. If this new Supreme Court is asked to decide the constitutionality of a forced parental consent law, it is likely that they will overturn the 1989 verdict and rule that abortion is not protected by the privacy clause, opening the floodgates to legislation limiting access to abortion.

The true purpose of the forced parental consent bills is therefore not to increase parental rights, but to take the first steps towards preventing safe and legal access towards abortion in Florida. For further proof that the arguments for forced parental consent are not being made in good faith, one needs only look to the politicians supporting HB 265 and SB 404.

Earlier this year, House Majority Leader José Olivia referred to pregnant women as “host bodies” five times during an interview. Olivia later apologized, but his language is indicative of how anti-choice legislators view women as mere vessels for reproduction.

Senator Dennis Baxley (R), a vocal proponent of forced parental consent, has twice in public interviews used language evoking the white nationalist “replacement theory”— that Caucasians in American and European are being “replaced” as the dominant racial majority by black and brown immigrants. In an interview with the Gainesville radio station WCJB, Baxely said: “You look at Europe, they’ve been under two percent birth rate and they’re not replacing themselves and so what’s happening is they’re migrating in a population as a workforce, who by the way does believe in having seven or eight children in a family, and they have no desire to assimilate to the current Western culture. They’re replacing that society.”Baxley echoes the language of white nationalists who seek to prevent white women from having access to birth control and abortions because they believe high birth rates are necessary to maintain a dominant white population. In addition to its inherent racism, this rhetoric is predicated on a conception of women as “host bodies”— broodmares whose only purpose in life is to reproduce.

Speaking at the Christian Family Coalition in August , Baxley was candid about the real agenda behind forced parent consent, saying “We have some new court members, we need another look at what the privacy clause means… in a way that could open the door for many other accomplishments.” Baxley implied that passing forced parental consent bills is intended to prompt a new Supreme Court ruling on the privacy clause, one that will make way for future restrictions on abortion.

Furthermore, the primary argument being made by supporters of forced parental consent — that it will protect Florida’s youth, simply isn’t supported by factual evidence. The Guttmacher Institute found in a 2012 study that “90 percent of 14-year-olds and 74 percent of 15-year-olds involve at least one parent or guardian in their abortion decision.” The 10% of minors that did not involve parents in their abortion decision “said they were afraid of being thrown out or abused by their guardian.”

Florida law already requires parents to be notified when a minor has an abortion. Just as young women are capable of making decisions about their own bodies, they are also capable of making decisions about when and when not to trust their parents. The reality is that not all Floridian youth have good relationships with their parents and no legislation can fix that. Forced parental consent will only place children with abusive guardians in further danger.

The forced parental consent bills do contain a judicial bypass, which theoretically allows minors to overrule their parents’ decision by obtaining a waiver from a judge. However, minors are not provided any assistance in navigating the Florida judicial system. A study conducted by If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice found that, of Florida’s 67 counties, only 11 were prepared to offer instructions for minors on how to receive a judicial bypass. “Florida courts are overwhelmingly unprepared to answer questions about the judicial waiver process,” the report said, “court staff’s inability to provide accurate and unbiased information compromises young people’s right to abortion access.”

Unlike the extreme anti-choice legislation passed by state legislators in Alabama and Georgia, Florida’s forced parental consent bills do not pose an obvious challenge to abortion rights. As Senator Baxley himself said, “the issue of parents taking responsibility of their children that parental consent is an easy argument,” because it frames the conversation around parental rights rather than abortion rights. However, the simple truth is that forced parental consent and the privacy clause as it now stands, protecting Floridians’ access to safe and legal abortion, cannot coexist. The lawmakers pushing HB 265 and SB 404 know this and their actions are part of a larger pattern of limiting women’s bodily autonomy.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Print

Filed Under: Featured, Politics Tagged With: 2020, abortion, feminism, Law, local, parental consent, politics, Reproductive Rights, Women

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Anne-Corinne says

    March 13, 2021 at 12:10 pm

    Good stuff!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured Posts

Don’t Tell Me to Be Strong : The Damaging Ways We Talk About Cancer

Don’t Tell Me to Be Strong : The Damaging Ways We Talk About Cancer

Promising Young Woman : Will We Ever Triumph Over Trauma?

Promising Young Woman : Will We Ever Triumph Over Trauma?

The Intersectionality of Masculine Norms and Eating Disorders

The Intersectionality of Masculine Norms and Eating Disorders

Connect With Us

Connect With Us

Official Spotify (Click Image)

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Bops and Flops
  • Collegiate Lenses
  • Economics
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • International
  • Interviews
  • Local
  • Music
  • Music Reviews
  • Perspectives
  • Politics
  • Science
  • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
  • TV Reviews
  • Uncategorized
  • Words You Don't Know

Follow Us On Twitter

My Tweets

Popular Tags

Africa Bops and Flops China Cold War Colonialism Colonization Diversity Egypt entertainment Fashion feminism Film Finance Florida Florida State University Football FSU Gender Gun Violence History Horror Human Rights Interview Latin America LGTBQ Literature local Middle East Music music review opinion perspectives politics Racism Science sga Space Sports Syria Syrian Civil War Tallahassee Television The F Word Video Games Women

Secondary Sidebar

Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Bops and Flops
  • Collegiate Lenses
  • Economics
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • International
  • Interviews
  • Local
  • Music
  • Music Reviews
  • Perspectives
  • Politics
  • Science
  • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
  • TV Reviews
  • Uncategorized
  • Words You Don't Know

Recent Posts

  • Don’t Tell Me to Be Strong : The Damaging Ways We Talk About Cancer
  • Hasbro’s Renaming of Potato Head Has Become the Next Moral Panic. Lazy Media Coverage is the Culprit.
  • March In Music : Bops and Flops
  • Is it safe, smart, or realistic for FSU to go “back to normal” in Fall 2021?
  • College is About More Than Degrees That “Lead to Jobs,” Senator Baxley

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in