• Skip to content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Contribute

SPIRE MAGAZINE

Earnest Perspectives on Changing Landscapes

  • View spiremag’s profile on Facebook
  • View spiremag’s profile on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • International
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Local
    • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • Science
  • Entertainment
    • Book Reviews
    • Music
      • Bops and Flops
  • Perspectives
  • Interviews
  • Series
    • Collegiate Lenses
    • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
    • Words You Don’t Know
    • Bops and Flops
You are here: Home / The F Word : Feminist Perspectives / The Glass Cliff: A Modern Successor to The Glass Ceiling
The Glass Cliff: A Modern Successor to The Glass Ceiling

The Glass Cliff: A Modern Successor to The Glass Ceiling

April 14, 2020 by Aoife Trotter Leave a Comment

The glass ceiling is a prominent metaphor for opportunity discrepancies between genders in the workplace. Widely understood as an inability for women to receive further promotion once they reach a certain level of authority, the glass ceiling is a reminder that females and other minorities are often systematically expected to maintain mediocrity within their careers. This takes the form of women, or members of a minority group, not receiving promotions or opportunities after reaching a certain level of workplace accomplishment. Once they achieve a certain level of success, higher leadership roles which the individual is well qualified for are systematically unavailable. 

However, with the current rise of awareness about prejudice and discrimination in the workplace, we see more women in leadership roles than ever before. But is this change motivated by positive cultural shifts? The glass cliff theory offers a more sinister explanation. 

Coined by researchers at the University of Exeter, the glass cliff theory “suggests that women are more likely to be appointed to leadership positions that are associated with an increased risk of criticism and failure.” In business, these promotions often follow a company crisis, but the glass cliff also extends to fields like law and politics, where women are given more difficult cases or must run for seats that they are unlikely to win. 

Between 1970 and 2009, the percentage of American female managers increased from 17% to 40%, yet studies suggest that regardless of education and level of leadership experience, people are more likely to promote or hire women when a company is failing. In a Harvard Business Review experiment, college students were 7% more likely to choose a female candidate after a previously male-dominated organization was struggling. When told that the organization was primarily headed by females, however, there was no difference, suggesting that “as long as a company headed by men performs well, there’s no perceived need to change its pattern of male leadership.” Thus women receive fewer opportunities to succeed until forced into unjustly rectifying the mistakes of previous male leaders.

The glass cliff is often difficult to condemn because of its subtlety and chances for success. For example, female CEOs like Marissa Mayer, Meg Whitman, Mary Barra, and Irene Rosenfeld have each succeeded in resurrecting their respective companies during periods of downturn. Yet many others, like Carol Bartz, Sallie Krawcheck, and Andrea Jung have not. While some may argue that the glass cliff is at least appointing women to these powerful leadership roles, regardless of the subconsious motives behind the promotions, we must learn to recognize the ways that conditioned gender roles and stereotypes influence our workplaces, economies, and governments. 

In Senior Executive Service positions held by women working for the federal government, women are less involved in policy making, feel less empowered, and regularly face prejudice. Candidate selection processes are also more likely to appoint females to run for riskier positions. Not only is this detrimental to female employees themselves, it also hosts a variety of negative implications for the ways our laws are made, changed, and promoted. 

Even when women achieve powerful political positions, they are continually disempowered by sexist workplace norms, and struggle to improve the laws which would remedy the solution. The glass cliff creates a toxic cycle in which women who strive to make a difference cannot do so even after reaching executive positions, and also renders the general female population less politically represented. 

The psychology behind the glass cliff effect can often be explained in terms of schemas, or mental sets or preconceived groupings, about who is an effective leader. Buttressed by stereotypes about gender characteristics involving strengths and weaknesses, management decisions perpetuate gender roles and assign women to positions that are believed to require more diplomacy or interpersonal leadership. This “think crisis-think female”  approach when intersected with “think manager-think male” creates indiscrepancies for job selection based on the organization’s needs, and perhaps more importantly, who is considered to be a heuristically better candidate. Put simply, gender roles recommend women for nurturing positions that can deflect crises after they occur, while men are viewed as natural leaders capable of managing under a continuum of situations. 

The glass cliff effect can be undermined and eradicated through practices like acknowledging implicit biases and changing the influence and empowerment of women in the workplace. Understanding that the glass cliff effect originates from gender roles ought to encourage self-reflection among managers and leaders, challenging them to redefine who they promote and why. 

In addition, empowerment in the workplace can reduce role incongruity, or the negative evaluation of women or minority leaders when they adopt untraditional traits, or traits that are not typically associated with their gender or race. Empowered women perform better in their jobs and are more likely to be included in decision making —, two factors that decrease incidents of the glass cliff effect. 

Overall, treating women equitably in the workplace, either through equal pay, and opportunities for advancement, or through congruent involvement with their male coworkers, leads to equalized promotion rates and job satisfaction. 

As society works towards narrowing the gender gap in the workplace, the glass cliff effect is a subtle, yet detrimental by-product of this social movement. Promoting women is crucial in establishing occupational equity, but the circumstances and reasonings behind these promotions must be analyzed honestly. 

An overlooked modern form of sexism, the glass cliff effect is difficult to substantiate because these promotions are generally seen as unquestionably positive. However, recognizing the role that gendered stereotypes play and adjusting company and organizational leadership accordingly would address problems of sexism from their roots and strengthen workplace diversity ethically.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Print

Filed Under: Featured, Perspectives, The F Word : Feminist Perspectives Tagged With: business, feminism, politics, The F Word, Women

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured Posts

The Intersectionality of Masculine Norms and Eating Disorders

The Intersectionality of Masculine Norms and Eating Disorders

“It’s Too F***ing Late” : 15 Protesters Arrested by TPD

“It’s Too F***ing Late” : 15 Protesters Arrested by TPD

“Everyone Started Running and Screaming” : Tallahassee Man Pulls Gun on Protesters

“Everyone Started Running and Screaming” : Tallahassee Man Pulls Gun on Protesters

Connect With Us

Connect With Us

Official Spotify (Click Image)

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Bops and Flops
  • Collegiate Lenses
  • Economics
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • International
  • Interviews
  • Local
  • Music
  • Music Reviews
  • Perspectives
  • Politics
  • Science
  • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
  • TV Reviews
  • Uncategorized
  • Words You Don't Know

Follow Us On Twitter

My Tweets

Popular Tags

Africa Bops and Flops China Cold War Colonialism Colonization Diversity Egypt entertainment Fashion feminism Film Finance Florida Florida State University Football FSU Gender Gun Violence History Horror Human Rights Interview Latin America LGTBQ Literature local Middle East Music music review perspectives politics Racism Science sga Space Sports Syria Syrian Civil War Tallahassee Television The F Word Video Games Women words you dont know

Secondary Sidebar

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Bops and Flops
  • Collegiate Lenses
  • Economics
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • FSU Politics and Social Change
  • International
  • Interviews
  • Local
  • Music
  • Music Reviews
  • Perspectives
  • Politics
  • Science
  • The F Word : Feminist Perspectives
  • TV Reviews
  • Uncategorized
  • Words You Don't Know

Recent Posts

  • 2020 in Music : Bops and Flops
  • Ratched : The Retelling of a Classic Character Falls Short
  • The Intersectionality of Masculine Norms and Eating Disorders
  • November in Music: Bops and Flops
  • As More Remote Learning Looms, Students Organize for Reimbursement

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in